Why Janitor AI Users Struggle to Adapt to Chub AI’s Unfiltered Style
Some users say they left Janitor AI to escape the filters. But once they get to Chub AI, they start complaining about the very freedom they claimed to want.
The problem isn’t the bots. It’s the shift in expectations.
Chub AI isn’t trying to be Janitor AI. It offers near-complete freedom over what’s allowed in text-based content.
There are tools to filter or block specific themes, but the platform doesn’t pre-censor what you see. This has led to clashes with users who assume everything should work the same way as it did on more moderated platforms.
Sites like AO3, nhentai, and even CrushOn AI have faced similar pushback from users who stumble into content they dislike.
But the solution isn’t censorship. It’s learning how to use the tools provided and understanding that fictional content isn’t there to suit everyone’s taste.
The Real Difference Between Janitor AI and Chub AI
At first glance, both Janitor AI and Chub AI offer access to character-based chatbots. But the way each platform handles moderation and user control is completely different.
Janitor AI imposes built-in filters. Certain topics and language are restricted, even in private chats. This was a major point of frustration for users who wanted more freedom to explore fictional scenarios without constant moderation flags or content bans.
Chub AI, on the other hand, removes those filters almost entirely. It treats users as adults, offering raw, unfiltered access to bot interactions. Only image content faces any real limits.
That freedom comes at a cost. Without pre-set boundaries, Chub AI relies on user-driven tagging and reporting.
If something is offensive or mislabeled, users are expected to block or report it. But many Janitor AI users aren’t used to that level of personal responsibility.
They migrate expecting a familiar environment and find themselves overwhelmed by content they didn’t anticipate, or didn’t take the time to filter.
This is where the conflict starts. Chub AI gives people what they asked for, but not in the hand-holding format they were used to. The result is a clash between platform design and user mindset.
How Chub AI and Janitor AI Compare
| Feature | Janitor AI | Chub AI |
|---|---|---|
| Content Moderation | Strict filters, even in private chats | Minimal moderation (text-based), images restricted |
| Tagging System | More standardized | Community-driven, inconsistent |
| User Control | Less control, more auto-filtering | Full control via blocklists |
| Audience Expectations | Cleaner experience, broader comfort zone | Unfiltered, niche-friendly |
| NSFW Policy | Regulated, limited access | Allowed with a few restrictions |
| Discoverability | Curated results | Open-ended, based on tags |
| Suitability for Beginners | More beginner-friendly | Better for advanced users who self-curate |
Complaints Are Often Just Culture Shock
Most of the criticism directed at Chub AI isn’t about actual platform flaws. It’s about user discomfort.
People see tags they don’t like, stumble into bots that offend them, and assume something is wrong with the system itself. But this isn’t a broken platform. It’s a platform that trusts users to decide what they want to see.
A Reddit user made this point clearly. They said people left Janitor AI because they didn’t want to be treated like children. Then they arrived at Chub AI and expected to be protected from adult content.
That contradiction speaks volumes. You can’t demand both freedom and full-time moderation. At some point, you have to filter your own feed.
This is especially obvious in the tagging complaints. Yes, Chub’s tag system can be inconsistent. But the platform also allows you to block any tag permanently.
Users who don’t want to see certain content can eliminate it with a few clicks. The problem isn’t that the tools don’t exist. It’s that users either don’t know how to use them, or don’t want to.
Some users even admit they went looking for edgy or extreme bots just to criticize them. That’s not a platform issue. That’s personal behavior.
And if a site like CrushOn.AI, which offers freedom with basic moderation, feels “cleaner” to some, it’s usually because it also filters what’s discoverable, not what’s possible.
Fiction Is Not Reality, and That’s the Point
One of the most common themes in the backlash is the idea that certain types of content shouldn’t exist because they make some people uncomfortable.
But in a fictional setting, the line between preference and censorship matters more than people think.
Text-based AI platforms like Chub AI give users the ability to create and engage with any kind of narrative. That includes disturbing or taboo scenarios. For some, this is a red flag.
They confuse fictional content with real-life endorsement. But fiction is not consent, and reading about something doesn’t mean supporting it.
This is where users from more curated spaces struggle. On Janitor AI, controversial content was filtered before it reached the user. On Chub AI, it’s visible if you choose not to block it.
Some users aren’t ready for that level of choice. They see something unexpected and assume the platform is flawed rather than taking action themselves.
This doesn’t mean every user has to like or engage with edgy content. It just means acknowledging that not everything is meant for you. If you’re not comfortable seeing it, use the filters.
If it’s incorrectly tagged, report it. That’s how the system improves. But asking for blanket removal of content just because it bothers you defeats the purpose of having a free platform.
Why Tagging Systems Matter More Here
Tagging is the backbone of Chub AI. It’s the one layer of control users can rely on to filter what they want and avoid what they don’t. But like any system built on user input, it has flaws.
Chub allows anyone to create new tags. This leads to overlap, confusion, and inconsistent labeling. Some users might tag a bot as “mommy” while others use “stepmom.”
The result is a messy system where users can’t always block everything they want to on the first try. But that doesn’t mean the platform is broken. It means you have to do a bit of work to get your filters right.
Longtime users understand this. They build blocklists. They report bad tags. They take the time to shape their own experience.
New users, especially those coming from Janitor AI, often expect that work to be done for them. When it’s not, they assume the worst.
The truth is, no tagging system is perfect. But on a site like Chub AI, where freedom is the default, the tagging system is what makes it usable.
The more effort users put into improving it, the better it gets for everyone. Complaining without participating doesn’t move the platform forward. Taking five seconds to report a tag does.
Migration Comes With Responsibility
Every time there’s a wave of users leaving Janitor AI, the same cycle plays out. People arrive on Chub AI expecting the same features, the same safety nets, and the same moderation standards.
But Chub was never meant to be a duplicate. It’s a different kind of platform that demands more from the user.
Freedom on Chub means you have to curate your own experience. It means you can’t rely on moderators to shield you from content you dislike. Some users aren’t prepared for that.
They act surprised when they see things they could have easily filtered out. Then they leave harsh reviews or start public complaints.
It’s not about denying people the right to be uncomfortable. It’s about owning the tools available. If a bot is mis-tagged, report it. If you don’t like a theme, block it. If you’re overwhelmed, take time to learn the interface.
These steps matter more on Chub because there’s no one holding your hand. You have to manage your own space.
Users who thrive on Chub are the ones who embrace that responsibility. They build lists, fine-tune searches, and help improve the system.
Those who don’t usually end up cycling back to platforms like Janitor AI, where those decisions are made for them.
It’s Okay to Leave, But Don’t Try to Change the Platform
Chub AI isn’t for everyone. That’s fine. No platform has to be. But trying to reshape it into something it was never meant to be helps no one. Chub is built for adults who want unfiltered interaction.
It’s not supposed to feel safe in the same way Janitor AI does.
The louder users demand changes that contradict the platform’s design, the more tension grows between communities. And often, these demands don’t come from a place of concern.
They come from discomfort with difference. Instead of adapting or moving on, some users try to force the platform to conform to their preferences.
This doesn’t work. Platforms that try to please everyone end up pleasing no one. Chub has already carved out its space by offering what other platforms restrict.
If that’s not what you’re looking for, there are alternatives. No one is trapped.
If you want a heavily moderated experience, you know where to go. But if you choose to stay on Chub, understand what it offers and how to manage your experience. Use the tools. Block what you don’t like. Respect that others may want something different from you.
